Brian May's court costs disaster as he fumes 'where's the justice'

Brian May's court costs disaster as he fumes 'where's the justice'

What

Brian May's court costs disaster as he fumes 'where's the justice' Brian May's court costs disaster as he fumes 'where's the justice' Brian May was unhappy after his full costs were not awarded following a court case against a neighbo Brian May was left raging about the justice system following a court case taken against a neighbour which saw him win "a paltry sum" and ultimately left him over a hundred thousand of pounds out of pocket due to a costs row.

Key points

  • Brian and his wife Anita Dobson brought proceedings in the county court for nuisance caused by a neighbour's basement development in 2016 when the couple were living in Kensington in London.
  • I spent £208,000 pounds, received £25,000 in damages, plus a derisory £42,000 in costs [including VAT], and so I end up being out of pocket on the whole thing by about £141,000 pounds.
  • Brian May's court costs disaster as he fumes 'where's the justice' Brian May was unhappy after his full costs were not awarded following a court case against a neighbo Brian May was left raging about the justice system following a court case taken against a neighbour which saw him win a paltry sum and ultimately left him over a hundred thousand of pounds out of pocket due to a costs row.
  • Brian May and Anita Dbson were left out of pocket after taking an action against a neighbour in 2016 This proportionality rule is nonsense, and makes a mockery of justice; it is yet another way of ensuring that the super-rich can do anything they like to increase their wealth, including destroying the quality of life of those around them.

Who

Brian May; Brian; Anita Dobson

When

e not awarded following a court case against a nei

Where

Kensington; London; us

Why

Brian May's court costs disaster as he fumes 'where's the justice' Brian May was unhappy after his full costs were not awarded following a court case against a neighbo Brian May was left raging about the justice system following a court case taken against a neighbour which saw him win "a paltry sum" and ultimately left him over a hundred thousand of pounds out of pocket due to a costs row.

How

Brian and his wife Anita Dobson brought proceedings in the county court for nuisance caused by a neighbour's basement development in 2016 when the couple were living in Kensington in London. "Master Rowley decided that the costs I'd detailed were inaccurate, or excessive (based on what evidence I have no idea), so he arbitrarily reduced them; and then he applied this new rule of proportionality, which dictates that if the costs are much higher than the damages, they must be reduced to be 'in proportion'...

Impact

Brian and his wife Anita Dobson brought proceedings in the county court for nuisance caused by a neighbour's basement development in 2016 when the couple were living in Kensington in London. "Master Rowley decided that the costs I'd detailed were inaccurate, or excessive (based on what evidence I have no idea), so he arbitrarily reduced them; and then he applied this new rule of proportionality, which dictates that if the costs are much higher than the damages, they must be reduced to be 'in proportion'...

Metrics

Political Spectrum
L
CL
N
CR
R
Bias Score 10.0%
Bias Label Neutral
Confidence Score 84.0%
Sentiment Score -0.15
Tone Emotional

Metrics Dictionary

A percentage indicating the degree of political bias detected in the article content.

0-20%: Minimal to no detectable bias

21-40%: Slight bias present but generally balanced

41-60%: Noticeable bias but attempts balance

61-80%: Strong bias present

81-100%: Extreme bias detected

A score from -1 to 1 measuring the emotional tone of the content.

-1.0 to -0.6: Strongly negative emotional content

-0.6 to -0.2: Moderately negative tone

-0.2 to 0.2: Balanced or neutral emotional tone

0.2 to 0.6: Moderately positive tone

0.6 to 1.0: Strongly positive emotional content

Indicates how certain the analysis is about its bias assessment.

0-33%: Limited confidence in assessment

34-66%: Reasonable confidence in assessment

67-100%: High confidence in assessment

Describes the political orientation of the content based on language and perspective.

Left

Generally favors progressive policies and significant government intervention

Center-Left

Moderately progressive with balanced government involvement

Neutral

Balanced perspective without clear political leaning

Center-Right

Moderately conservative with limited government involvement

Right

Generally favors conservative policies and minimal government intervention

Please Login to comment

Similar Articles