Amanda Knox insists 'I really honour Meredith's memory' as she defends memoir
What
Amanda Knox insists 'I really honour Meredith's memory' as she defends memoir Amanda Knox insists 'I really honour Meredith's memory' as she defends memoir Amanda Knox has defended releasing her latest memoir by saying honouring her murdered flatmate Meredith Kercher's past "does not mean erasing my own".
Key points
- The 37-year-old criticised Ms Kercher's family's lawyer who said the initiatives of Knox continue to be inappropriate and disrespectful, as she told ITV's Good Morning Britain (GMB) that he can very politely keep his opinions to himself.
- Amanda Knox insists 'I really honour Meredith's memory' as she defends memoir Amanda Knox has defended releasing her latest memoir by saying honouring her murdered flatmate Meredith Kercher's past does not mean erasing my own.
- Ms Knox said she hoped Ms Kercher's family would read her second memoir, adding: I really honour Meredith's memory.
- Officers discovered the body of British foreign exchange student Ms Kercher in her bedroom in Perugia on November 2 2007.
- Amanda Knox (right) at Heathrow Airport after her acquittal (David Dyson/PA)
Who
Amanda Knox; Ms Knox; Ms Kercher
When
insists 'I really honour Meredith's memory' as sh
Where
Perugia; Italy
Why
Ms Knox said she hoped Ms Kercher's family would read her second memoir, adding: "I really honour Meredith's memory." Amanda Knox (right) at Heathrow Airport after her acquittal (David Dyson/PA) Officers discovered the body of British foreign exchange student Ms Kercher in her bedroom in Perugia on November 2 2007.
How
Amanda Knox insists 'I really honour Meredith's memory' as she defends memoir Amanda Knox has defended releasing her latest memoir by saying honouring her murdered flatmate Meredith Kercher's past "does not mean erasing my own".
Impact
It was written at a time when I felt like so many people were authoring my experience and saying what it was and I felt like I needed to set the record straight. "It was written at a time when I was deeply immersed in the legal saga and in proving my innocence. "Today, I look at this as an opportunity to share a story of, not erasing the past but really learning from the past so that we can live better lives, personally and as a society." Asked about the impact her book could have on Ms Kercher's family, Ms Knox said: "I hope that they read my book because I really honour Meredith's memory in the book but I also believe that honouring her past and story does not mean erasing my own. "I am a person who is continuing to pursue justice in this case but a bigger issue that I try and speak to and free is how do we all overcome the traumas that are in our lives, regardless of whether or not we get what we deserve." Ms Knox was also asked to respond to the words of Ms Kercher's family's lawyer, Francesco Maresca, who said: "It's evident that for Knox the Perugia trial continues to be a source of income and a series of opportunities to maintain her name in the media." In response, Ms Knox told GMB: "Well, I would say that he's a hypocrite, honestly, as someone who himself has profited not just off the work that he has done on the case but in writing his own book, I think that Mr Maresca can very politely keep his opinions to himself. "He has always been very much a man who has never, ever considered my humanity and experience and is subject to something that I like to call single victim fallacy. "The idea that in a tragic event, there can only be one victim, and that is simply not true so I think, I don't really care what Mr Maresca thinks, to be frank."
Metrics
Metrics Dictionary
A percentage indicating the degree of political bias detected in the article content.
0-20%: Minimal to no detectable bias
21-40%: Slight bias present but generally balanced
41-60%: Noticeable bias but attempts balance
61-80%: Strong bias present
81-100%: Extreme bias detected
A score from -1 to 1 measuring the emotional tone of the content.
-1.0 to -0.6: Strongly negative emotional content
-0.6 to -0.2: Moderately negative tone
-0.2 to 0.2: Balanced or neutral emotional tone
0.2 to 0.6: Moderately positive tone
0.6 to 1.0: Strongly positive emotional content
Indicates how certain the analysis is about its bias assessment.
0-33%: Limited confidence in assessment
34-66%: Reasonable confidence in assessment
67-100%: High confidence in assessment
Describes the political orientation of the content based on language and perspective.
Left
Generally favors progressive policies and significant government intervention
Center-Left
Moderately progressive with balanced government involvement
Neutral
Balanced perspective without clear political leaning
Center-Right
Moderately conservative with limited government involvement
Right
Generally favors conservative policies and minimal government intervention
Please Login to comment